So the big winner is RazorSQL and for $69, well worth it and feature ridden. The Razor is lightning fast and is only a 16meg download and has everything an SQL developer needs including a TSQL editor. The other is RazorSQL which only costs $69 per user.Īqua data studio is good, but a resource hog and basically pretty sluggish and has non essential features such as the ER diagram tool, which is pretty bad at that. The first one is Aqua Data Studio which costs about $450 per user, which is a barely acceptable, but cheap compared to DBArtizan and others with similar functionality (but MS only). However, now (March 2010) I believe there are two serious contenders and worthwhile versions for the MAC and Linux which have a low cost associated with them. I don't use the MS product because it is only limited to MS SQL.īottom line is nothing free is worthwhile, nor were most commercial non windows products Nothing compared to DBArtizan on Windows as far as I was concerned and I was prepared to use it with Fusion or VirtualBox. That included dbvisualizer, squirrel (particularly bad, even though the windows haters in my office swear by it), the oracle SQL developer and a bunch of others.
#Sqlectron exe for mac#
I have tried just about everything for MAC and Linux and never found anything worthwhile.
I also ended up using Fusion and a Windows client. When this question was asked there were very few tools out there were worth much.
#Sqlectron exe drivers#
This solution isn't free.Īll of the above can be used with the ODBC Drivers for Sybase & Microsoft SQL Server (or other databases) we also produce. My employer makes an enterprise-grade JDBC-to-ODBC Bridge, available as either a Single-Tier (installs entirely on the client application host) or a Multi-Tier (splits components over the client application host and the ODBC data source host, enabling JDBC client applications in any JVM to use ODBC data sources on Mac, Windows, Linux, etc.). JVM/JRE/JDK documentation has always advised against using this built-in except in experimental scenarios, or when no other option exists, because this component was built as a proof-of-concept, and was never intended for production use. These components are free, for Mac, Windows, and more.Īpplicable to many of the other answers here - the Type 1 JDBC-to-ODBC Bridge that most are referring to is the one Sun built in to and bundled with the JVM. My employer produces a simple, proof-of-concept HTML5-based SQL client which can be used against any ODBC data source on the web-browser host machine, through the HTML5 WebDB-to-ODBC Bridge we also produce.
0 kommentar(er)
